“They can’t be here for us.”
-Rashon Nelson & Donte Robinson, prior to their arrest at a Philadelphia Starbucks
“The police officers did absolutely nothing wrong.”
-Richard Ross, Philadelphia Police Commissioner
“Anytime I’m encountered by cops, I can honestly say it’s a thought that runs through my mind. You never know what’s going to happen.”
-Rashon Nelson (speaking to AP News about fearing for his life)
“Players who have not followed the rules, specifically pace of play, have voluntarily left at our request as our scorecard states. In this instance, the members refused so we called police to ensure an amicable result.
During the second conversation, we asked members to leave per our policy noted on the scorecard, voices were raised, and the police were called to ensure an amicable resolution.”
-Jordan Chronister, Co-Owner, Grand View Golf Course York County, PA
My Dear Readers,
After five years of grieving the loss of my beloved spouse Linda, I am in Paris, France celebrating the year 2018 as my breakout year, the year I emerge from darkness into the bright shining light that the world has to offer.
As I depart the country, I leave behind the recent incidents of psychological devastation impacting African-American citizens. In a previous writing, I had suggested that it was time to begin a conversation regarding the impact of whites calling upon the police to intervene, eject or arrest African-Americans for believed slights or perceptions.
One of my readers, Mike Willbur MS LMHC, a colleague in the mental health profession, responded to me, suggesting that fear is the element and wanting to know where do we start. I was intrigued and conflicted by the question.
How do we get all Americans, regardless of race, to understand the impact of fear and traumatization? How do I help to bring understanding without intellectualizing this major issue that impacts the lives of millions of people, both white and black on a daily basis?
I choose to respond to the element of fear by seeking to further define the themes that create fear and lead to these traumatic moments.
What Is A “Starbucks Moment?”
This occurs when a white person, for a minor reason or infraction, utilizes the police to seek the investigation, removal, and/or arrest of a black person. This is done under the premise of community policing.
There are five themes that coincide to create the occurrence of “Having a Starbucks Moment”
- Power versus the lack of power
- Primary citizenship versus secondary citizenship.
- Dominant group versus non-dominant group.
- Privileged versus lacking privileged.
- Views & Interconnection of Policing & Law Enforcement
There was the now widely known incident at the Starbucks store in Philadelphia in which two African-American men were arrested while waiting for a colleague to conduct a business meeting.
There has been another incident occurring in Pennsylvania in which white golf course owners called the police to remove five African-American women members of their club because they were “playing too slowly.” Unlike the Philadelphia Starbucks, the police, upon arriving at the scene and conducting interviews, decided that the matter was not one that warranted police intervention.
The white owners of the golf course justified their actions by declaring that the five black women, in playing slowly, had failed to abide by the course’s rules and policies. They added that they had offered full refunds, but the group refused to leave, so the police were called in to remove them.
If an arrest had been made, the following would had been the result:
- The five black women would have been handcuffed, placed in a police vehicle, taken to jail, fingerprinted and had mug shots taken.
- Those fingerprints and mug shots would had become a permanent record in the national computer database, the National Crime Information Center (NCIC)
- Resulting in the ability to track their movements nationally and internationally through the International Crime Police Commission (INTERPOL)
The five themes leading to a “Having a Starbucks Moment is detailed in the following are detailed in the following:
- The Power versus the Lack of Power.
- White Americans have power or potential access to power.
- Black Americans either lack power/lack access to power or are risked of being stripped of the power granted to them by those in power.
- Primary citizenship versus secondary citizenship.
- Primary citizenship consists of individuals of all genders; are of the group holding power are racially white, and are identified ethnically and culturally as Euro-Americans. Primary citizenship is a status passed on between generations.
- Secondary citizenship consists of individuals of all genders; are of the group lacking power; are racially black and are identified ethically lacking power are racially black, ethnically/culturally as African-American. Secondary citizenship is a status passed on through the generations.
- Dominant group versus non-dominant group.
- White Euro-Americans have dominant group status, a status passed on through the generations.
- Black African-American group has non-dominant status, a status passed on through the generations.
- Privileged versus lacking privilege.
- White Euro-Americans are viewed with having privileged status; a status that is often fervently denied by the individuals within that group.
- Black African-Americans have non-privileged status and fervently seek having such privilege, which is either denied or provided on a selected basis.
- Views & Interconnection of Policing & Law Enforcement
- White Euro-Americans view the police positively and connect with them in “community policing,” which is an understanding that is passed on through the generations.
- Black African-Americans view the police with suspicion and connect with them in “enforcing the law,” which is an understanding that is passed on through the generations.
I am not a Racist, but what if I Walked like a Duck, and Quacked like a Duck?
In taking part of this conversation, white or Euro-Americans must seek to hold themselves for actions and behaviors, whether conscious or unconscious, that are racist in nature and serve to denigrate black or African-Americans. Racism can be divided into two broad categories, attitudinal and behavioral.
In attitudinal racism, individuals or groups are denigrated because of shared characteristics. Behavioral racism can be any act by an individual or institution that denies free and equal treatment to a person or person because of shared characteristics or ethnic group membership. The outcome of either can result in physical or psychological stressors producing physical or psychological responses that over time can influence health outcomes of those who are impacted.
The white or Euro-American may staunchly deny or be unable to perceive their actions towards blacks or African-Americans as racist. Those holding such beliefs may be engaging in patterns of behaviors defined as modern racism or aversive racism.
In modern racism, individuals do not define their beliefs and attitudes as racist but rather their beliefs are based on “empirical” evidence, such as news accounts, social media, movies, or television. Modern racism is insidious because those who practice this deny racist attitudes in a defensive manner, but engage in racist actions that they justify based on their supposed evidence, which usually takes the form of anecdotes or personally- based beliefs.
Aversive racism, another form of insidious racism, is a set of abstract moral assertions and beliefs impacting the lives of African-Americans. Specifically, the aversive racist says, “I’m not a racist, but…” and may engage in crazy-making interactions with African-Americans by overtly denying racist intent while acting in ways that feel racist to their target. Due to the overt denial of racist intent, the individual(s) targeted who appraises the behavior as racist may be labeled as “over-reactive” or paranoid” resulting from the interaction, leading to further marginalization.
The incident resulting at the Starbucks appears to be one of modern racism. There is the indication that the white or Euro-American manager for whatever reasoning did not want the black or African-American men in “her” place of business and notified the police, resulting in their arrest and removal. The flip side of this incident would have the modern racist declaring, “Well, if only they would have left, or not come in at all, the arrest would not had been necessary.”
The golf course incident is a clear example of aversive racism. The declarations of the co-owner were simply “we allowed them in to our establishment. They failed to obey by the rules of the club. We asked them to leave. They refused. The police were called to ensure an amicable resolution.”
Concluding Words-Dr. Kane
“To err is human… In some cases there is no room for error. None.”
– Dr. Micheal Kane
We may breathe the same air but it still appears that blacks (or African-Americans) and whites (or Euro-Americans) live on two on two separate planets. I agree with my colleague Mike Willbur MS LMHC that fear is the element. It is my opinion that this is where we must start.
Fear is a factor deeply ingrained in both groups. I am not a white or Euro-American. As a black male and African-American, I acknowledge the fear that lives within me on a daily basis regarding the fact that any interaction with a white person can abruptly change the course of my life.
Several days prior to leaving for Paris, I had my own Starbucks moment at a local Starbucks in Seattle. The incident only lasted several minutes, but it so easily could have ended badly and changed the course of my life forever.
I was in line waiting when a white woman who was in a hurry jumped ahead of me and sought to get her order in. The white Starbucks employee took notice of what had happened and began to assist her, ignoring me.
I am a 260 dark skinned African-American male, and was one of now two people in line, the other being the white woman who demanded to be waited on. Am I now invisible?
Many thoughts went through my mind:
- Should I say something in a polite way to the interloper and the Starbucks employee?
- If I do, will I be perceived as being threatening by either of these women?
- Will the Starbucks employee or the interloper call the police?
When the police arrive, the bottom line is this:
It is my word versus the word of two white women.
Here are the facts of my life:
- I have earned a doctorate and two master’s degrees. I am internationally trained in clinical traumatology.
- I have served on three separate clinical faculties in one of the top ten research universities in the United States.
- I have published material which is taught in graduate schools and utilized within the US Veteran Affairs healthcare system.
- I have served as a clinical consultant to the Black Congressional Caucus Veteran Braintrust.
- I am a founding member of the Editorial Board for a peer reviewed journal.
- I currently served the legal and judicial system as a forensic evaluator and expert witness on trauma related issues.
This is the reality in my life:
- I have never been arrested, fingerprinted or jailed.
- I am a honorably discharged veteran of military service.
- I am the son of a police officer.
- I am an African-American residing in a country in which there are those who either fear me or are threatened by me simply because of the color of my skin.
What could happen to me in this situation:
- I am going to be arrested, taken to jail, fingerprinted and mug shots taken.
- I am going to have to incur the expenses of hiring an attorney to respond to possible legal charges.
- I am going to have a permanent arrest record thus allowing law enforcement to track my movements nationally and internationally .
- I would have been publicly humiliated and traumatized by the experience thereby bearing psychological wounds for the rest of my life.
What I Did:
- I chose to not speak to the interloper.
- I brought the matter to the attention of the Starbucks employee.
The Response:
- The employee response was “I’m sorry…what can I get you?”
- A telephone call later to the store manager, who said, “I will look into the matter.”
- A written correspondence to the district manager- no response as of today.
I made the best decision of a very difficult and humiliating incident. There was no police intervention, but there was no amicable resolution either. And, I remained alive and free and made it to Paris, the City of Light, where I am currently enjoying a well-deserved vacation before returning to respond to more Starbucks Moments!
The Mask
By Maya Angelou
We wear the mask that grins and lies.
It shades our cheeks and hides our eyes.
This debt we pay to human guile
With torn and bleeding hearts…
We smile and mouth the myriad subtleties.
Why should the world think otherwise
In counting all our tears and sighs.
Nay let them only see us while
We wear the mask.
Adieu from Paris!
Until we speak again…I am … The Visible Man.